2025 International Conference on Digital Education and Information Technology (DEIT 2025)
Editorial Policy
Home / Editorial Policy



Editorial Policy


All new manuscripts for the DEIT 2025 conference should be submitted directly via 【Online Editorial System】. By using the online system, you can access and process submitted papers from anywhere with internet access, and all the records including files and exchanges will be maintained.

Step 1. To keep scientific integrity, one of our editors will run Turnitin on each new submission to see if has a problem with possible plagiarism. Papers not passing the plagiarism check will be desk rejected immediately.
Step 2. Then the publication chairs will have an initial check on the new submission to ensure it's within the scope of the conference and decide if it merits further review. If the new manuscript passed the initial check, it would be assigned to reviewers for double-blind peer review.
Step 3. Each selected paper will be reviewed by at least two/three independent experts with related research backgrounds mainly on originality, validity, quality, and readability.
Step 4. Review Reports received from the experts will be judged by one of the editors with international scientific standards.
Step 5. If logical, then Review Reports will be sent to authors to modify the manuscript accordingly. If not logical, the editor can assign a new reviewer or judge on his/her own.
Step 6. Authors will be required to revise their papers according to the points raised.
Step 7. The revised version will then be evaluated by the editor to determine whether the points raised by the reviewers have been addressed or not.
Step 8. Then the editor will send the revised manuscript to the reviewers again for re-evaluation.

Step 9. If the reviewers approve the revised version of the manuscript, then the Editor-in-Chief will make the final decision for the publication.


Ethical Code

1. The conference focuses on scholarly communications and exchange and allows any follow-up based on any published preliminary report here(e.g., an abstract, poster, or conference presentation).


2. Authors who publish any future papers based on the one posted at this conference should cite it and add enough new and significant results as required by the journal(s).